The Difference Between Influencers and Advocates in Crisis

Submit to redditSubmit to StumbleUponShare on Tumblr

What is the difference between an advocate and an influencer? How will they act when it comes to crisis communications?

Jay Baer, the main man at Convince and Convert, shared an infographic recently on the difference between influencers and advocates. He encouraged his readers to share the infographic, so I thought it might be a good exercise to understand how these two groups influence our understanding of how crisis information is shared in social media. Jay has written about the subject before here, so this piece was a good visual reminder of his earlier thoughts.

Baer highlights two issues we need to keep in mind: one group has the power to drive action, the other just drives awareness. Awareness in itself is not without benefits, but Baer maintains that we tend to confuse audience with influence, meaning numbers are not a measure of influence, just a measure of reach. The second issue is one of passion. Baer says, “Advocacy is driven by the depth of conviction, and influencers typically are less committed to the product or company than are actual customer advocates.”

When it comes to crisis communications planning, we need to keep in mind the effect that each of these groups will have, and what the advantages and disadvantages of each may be.

Influencers will:

  • help spread your message and reach a wide audience by retweeting and reposting your information.
  • help spread other sources’ messages as well, despite whether they support your information or not.

Influencers may not:

  • advocate for your side of the story regardless of whether you are right or wrong.
  • gain the trust of their audience (see infographic).
  • stay with the crisis, but may forget about the event after the initial burst of information is spread and move on to another news story.

Advocates will:

  • help spread you message and reach a wide audience by retweeting and reposting your information (same as influencers).
  • probably spread other sources’ messages only if they fortify your position and emphasize information that will help you mitigate your event.
  • post their own sentiments that advocate for your position.
  • Stay with the event and spread messages throughout the duration of the crisis.

See the infographic with Jay’s post here.

I’d like to hear your thoughts about the infographic. Which of the statistics strikes you?  You’re welcome to start a discussion in the comments.

 

 

About cksyme

Chris Syme heads a strategic communications and training agency in Bozeman, Montana. CKSyme.org specializes in social media strategies and training with a crisis/reputation expertise. Chris is a frequent presenter on the national stage at college athletics and higher ed events. She has 25+ years in the communications field. Her recent e-book, Listen, Engage, Respond: Crisis Communications in Real-Time, is available on Amazon.com.

  • http://www.socialcustomer.com Christopher Carfi

    Yup, spot-on. This is exactly the postion we take as well. Influencers will amplify, but advocates will *defend*. More here: http://www.slideshare.net/antseyeview/advocates-and-influencers

    • http://www.cksyme.org Chris Syme

      Thanks for stopping by. In your slideshow, I love the three levels of advocacy: like, love, defend. It’s a great illustration of the progression that advocates go through, and applies directly to how we coach organizations in crisis planning. Great work and thanks for the link.

    • http://humanwebsite.com.my Kent

      Hi Christopher, thanks for your explanation. Influencers will amplify, but advocates will defend. All the while I was confused, but after reading your slideshare, it tells me the difference between influencers and advocates.

      So, any more articles how to acquire advocates?